Which of the following makes a true statement about the case of State v. Justin B. Goode ?
The defendant plead guilty to the charges at his arraignment.
The teacher testified that Goode would not break the law.
The police officer could not find any evidence against Goode.
The neighbor said that Goode sold him stolen video games.

Respuesta :

The State v. Justin B. Goode is a criminal case in which Goode is accused of stealing video games in a video game store. Usually, a criminal case begins with a charge filed by a jury, or a prosecutor.

In this case, evidence of vital importance for the jury to consider the case of Mrs Snoozer is the fact that Dibeast saw a bird on the Early Farm on the day the birds disappeared. Mrs. Snoozer was seeking compensation for her missing birds.

Right answer is: The teacher testified that Goode would not break the law

The answer choice which is a true statement about the case of State v. Justin B. Goode is:

  • B. The teacher testified that Goode would not break the law.

According to the given question, we are asked to show the true statement which accurately describes the court case between Goode and the State where he was accused of stealing a video game.

As a result of this, the key witness in the case for the jury to deliberate on was Goode's teacher who testified that Goode would not break the law and this was one of the accurate details of the events that occured in the case.

Therefore, the correct answer is option B

Read more here:

https://brainly.com/question/16516884

Q&A Education