Which statement best summarizes part of the ruling in Gibbons v. Ogden?

A: Regulating interstate commerce is an abuse of power.

B: A state can make laws that regulate commerce in neighboring states.

C: State licenses make federal licenses unnecessary.

D: A state can regulate commerce that takes place within its own borders.

Respuesta :

A statement that best summarizes the ruling in Gibbons v. Ogden is B: A state can make laws that regulate commerce in neighboring states.

What happened in Gibbons v. Ogden?

In this landmark case, the Supreme Court ruled that states could regulate commerce in the states that are close to them by regulating their own commerce.

This happened after Gibbons and Ogden were in conflict as to who had more right to use the state waters with one having a federal license, and the other, a state license.

Find out more on Gibbons v. Ogden at https://brainly.com/question/583532.

#SPJ4

Q&A Education