Why is "blue cheese is better than cheddar cheese" not a good hypothesis?
A. The hypothesis is not a complete sentence.
B. It does not answer a testable question.
C. The topic is not important.
D. Cheese cannot be measured over and over again.

B) It does not answer a testable question.

Why is it better than cheddar cheese? What criteria are being used to measure differentiate between the two?

The answers are too subjective and therefore the tests cannot be repeated and guaranteed to get the same outcome.

Answer Link

Why is "blue cheese is better than cheddar cheese" not a good hypothesis? A. The hypothesis is not a complete sentence. B. It does not answer a testable question. C. The topic is not important. D. Cheese cannot be measured over and over again.

Respuesta :

Otras preguntas

Why is "blue cheese is better than cheddar cheese" not a good hypothesis?
A. The hypothesis is not a complete sentence.
B. It does not answer a testable question.
C. The topic is not important.
D. Cheese cannot be measured over and over again.