The Espionage and Sedition Acts were used to suppress not only antiwar sentiment but also politically radical ideas, especially socialist ones. The postmaster general, who had the authority to censor periodicals, declared that “most” socialist publications expressed treasonous ideas.

: Based on the paragraph above, we see that suppression of ideas was part of the strategy used by the Wilson administration to guarantee support of the U.S. involvement in WWI. Is it ever okay to use suppression or suspend our Bill of Rights especially as they apply to free speech in the United States? If so, when is it okay, and why? If not, then why? Remember to include 2 examples as evidence to support your opinion.

As pertaining to the United States, the Bill of Rights is known to be the first ten amendment of the constitution. It's a bill that guarantees the civil rights and liberties to individuals.

In other words, it bestows on the freedom of speech, religion, and press.

If the above is what the Bill of Rights is, then suppressing it is same as suppressing the people.

If the Bill of Rights is suppressed or suspended:

The federal government will have total power over the people.
It will weaken the relationship between the government and the people.
It will expose and endanger the people to rogue politicians.
The vulnerable people in the society will suffer.

Thus, suppression or suspension of the Bill of Rights isn't okay.

Learn more about Bill of Rights on https://brainly.com/question/11330436