irisr7475
contestada

Please helpp.
Korematsu v.United States (1944)

In Korematsu v. the United States, you read about Japanese Americans being singled out and detained,
without trial, specifically because of their race/ethnicity. In your opinion, are there any circumstances
under which you see such actions as being acceptable? Is national security more important than
constitutional rights? Explain your answers.

Respuesta :

Azinadangol

Answer:

hope it helps ... stay safe

Explanation:

United States, legal case in which the U.S. Supreme Court, on December 18, 1944, upheld (6–3) the conviction of Fred Korematsu—a son of Japanese immigrants who was born in Oakland, California—for having violated an exclusion order requiring him to submit to forced relocation during World War II.

Otras preguntas

Q&A Education