imagine some arguments that start from faulty assumptions such as if pigs could fly or if money grew on trees. what would be some of the logical consequences?

Some of the logical consequences when an individual uses faulty assumptions such as "if pigs could fly" or "if money grew on trees" to wage arguments, is that those assumptions are not base on reality and are kind of metaphors or language figures to state a point in the conversation.

So, the discussion could derive in something that is not productive for the parts involved and a real solution could be delayed. Instead, using facts, data, and logical reasons can greatly improve any dialogue an invites the parts to reach a conclusion or agreement that satisfies both parts.

annyksl annyksl · Answer 2 · 2021-11-11T14:18:58+01:00

The logical consequence would be the establishment of a very subjective dialogue, which could even be unsatisfactory.

We can arrive at this answer because:

The use of erroneous assumptions, such as those presented in the question above, are presented colloquially.
These assumptions have no real meaning, but seek to emphasize a subject through subjective sentences, in colloquial language.
The logical achievement for this type of language is the establishment of an inaccurate dialogue full of subjectivity.
This happens because the people involved in this dialogue will not be led to believe these assumptions, they may be dissatisfied with the lack of precision in the dialogue.

In this case, although the colloquial language is efficient in some cases, it can trigger weak and lacking objectivity dialogues.

More information:

https://brainly.com/question/13953738?referrer=searchResults