How would a secondary source be beneficial to a historian studying a particular event?

A. It would eliminate the need for her to evaluate primary sources that have already been analyzed by other historians.
B. It would allow her to determine whether sources are reliable or unreliable without needing to actually read them.
C. It would eliminate the need for her to use any primary sources to support the historical argument she hopes to make.
D. It would help her organize her primary sources without having to rely on techniques like historiography or chronological thinking.

Respuesta :

The best and most correct answer among the choices provided by your question is the first choice or letter A.

A secondary source would be beneficial to a historian studying a particular event because it would eliminate the need for her to evaluate primary sources that have already been analyzed by other historians.

I hope my answer has come to your help. Thank you for posting your question here in Brainly. We hope to answer more of your questions and inquiries soon. Have a nice day ahead!

CORRECT ANSWER~ (A) Β It would eliminate the need for her to evaluate primary sources that have already been analyzed by other historians.

Q&A Education