Is Don Kusler suggesting that the Electoral College has never benefited the United States?
Which sentence from the article BEST supports your response?
(A) Yes. "This outdated result of a constitutional compromise happened when the U.S. was very different."
(B) No. "The system's goal of ensuring smaller states have adequate representation is important."
(C) Yes. "The way the legislative branch is set up already achieves the goal of balancing power among states of varying population."
(D) No. "Imagine a scenario where the executive branch is led by a president who did not receive a majority of the popular vote."

The time has come to modify or end the Electoral College method of choosing the U.S. president. Each state is granted a certain quantity of votes in the Electoral College, depending on the extent of its population. The candidate who meets the outset of 270 constituent votes wins the presidency. In almost every state, a contestant who wins 50% of the general vote is granted 100 percent of its constituent votes. This outdated decision of a constitutional settlement occurred when the U.S. was very strange. There were some states. Only white men had the liberty to vote. And this was before general suffrage was registered.