Consider this argument: LOGIC BASED, NOT PERSONAL EXPERIENCE
The coffee is hot or it is strong. The coffee is not strong, therefore it is not hot.

is the argument invalid or valid?

Respuesta :

Answer:invalid

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

I would say Invalid

Step-by-step explanation:

Because if a coffee is hot it is strong and if a coffee is cold it would be strong still. (sorry if incorrect!)

Q&A Education