Respuesta :
Answer:
These actions would not constitute wrongful interference.
Explanation:
Wrongful interference would require either the small janitorial company to cause or convince the rival company to breach their contract with the college. Or it would require the janitorial company to cause the college to drop the rival company as a service provider. Since none of these actions perform or attempt to perform any of the actions stated above, and since they are based around the marketing of the janitorial company without being at the expense of anyone else, they would not constitute wrongful interference.
When there is a deliberate infringement of the contract by a third party is called wrongful interference.
The action by the small janitor service business is not a wrongful interference.
- If the contracting company was purposely persuaded by the small janitorial services to breach the contract then it will be wrongful interference.
- Also if the college was persuaded by the small company to drop the large competitive firms contract then it could be possible for the interference.
- As none of the acts was employed by the small corporation to interfere with the working it cannot be declared as a wrong business deed.
- The small company only used the methods of advertising which is not a wrong method.
To learn more about wrongful interference follow the link:
https://brainly.com/question/988936