Respuesta :
Answer: The city council may not be able to conclude anything about the public support that is gained for mayor’s initiative.
Explanation:
Here, in this case:
183 is the total number of residents that showed up .
Out of these only 31 raised their hand in favor of the mayor's initiative.
Therefore, we can state that :
The proportion of individuals in favor are given as
[tex]In\ favor = \frac{Individuals\ who\ showed\ support }{Total\ residents}[/tex]
[tex]In\ Favor = \frac{31}{183}[/tex]
[tex]In\ Favor = 16.9[/tex]
In Favor ≈ 0.17 or 17%
we can also state that the individuals who showed up can be biased. In similar regards, the method used to vote may also tend to alter individuals mind, further making these votes non-independent.
In regards to the public support for the prison project, the city council cannot conclude anything for two reasons:
- Because the people who came likely have strong opinions on the project.
- Raising hands can influence others to raise hands as well.
Why can the vote not be trusted?
The majority of the 183 people who came most probably only came because they did not support the project and wanted to make their feelings known.
Also voting by raising hands can influence people to either vote for something or against it depending on which motion gets more hands raised. A secret ballot might have yielded a different result.
In conclusion, there was response bias.
Find out more on response bias at https://brainly.com/question/26430204.