1) Close Reading: According to the Federalist Papers, are the Bill of Rights necessary? Why or why
not? Cite evidence from at least one of the Federalist Papers to support your claim.​

Respuesta :

Answer: it is not necessary

Explanation:

Federalists believed it wasn’t necessary because they believed it wasn’t up too the people it was up too the government only

According to the Federalist Papers, are the Bill of Rights were not necessary.

  • Federalists believed that the Constitution only restricted the government, not the people.
  • The Federalist Papers writer like James Madison fought for ratification of the Constitution without a bill of rights.
  • James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay were the authors of the Federalist Papers.

Therefore we can conclude that the Federalist Papers did not approve of the Bill of Rights.

Learn more about " the Federalist Papers" here:

brainly.com/question/19128911

Ver imagen saltywhitehorse
Q&A Education