Respuesta :
Answer: Gary is a Laissez faire leader
Explanation:
This is a leadership style in which the leader doesn't use authoritarian style over the people that they lead. They try to lead people to work on their own without too much control from the leader. The leader with this style has a belief that people work better when they are left to take charge in their own way.
It is also referred to as a delegative leadership style , the leader delegates the work to the group and let them decide how to navigate the whole project or task. It has its disadvantages and advantages. It can work well in particular situations and not in other situations.
Benefits
It works great when individuals are motivated members or employees with advance,great skills and expertise
It builds independence and confidence in one's own ability to do work
Downfalls
It may not work well if people are not that knowledgeable about the job or task given .
It may create conflicts amongst members everyone raising their own way that needs to be followed to do the work.
From this statement, Gary can be said to be the leader of the Laissez-faire type.
Further explanation
A laissez-faire type leader wants all components of the education sector to carry out their duties freely. Therefore, the type of free leadership is the ability to influence others to be willing to work together to achieve the goals set by the way various activities are left to subordinates. Because the meaning of classes itself is literally to permit and fair is free. So the definition of laissez-faire is to give to others with the principle of freedom, including subordinates to carry out their duties freely by the wishes of subordinates.
The laissez-faire leader is the opposite of autocratic leadership and is often called liberal because he gives members a lot of freedom to take their steps in dealing with something. If an autocratic leader dominates, then this type of laissez-faire leader leaves the matter entirely to the members.
For example in a school meeting, the principal gives everything to the education staff, both determining the goals, implementation procedures, activities to be carried out, as well as facilities and infrastructure that will be used. The principal is passive, does not directly involve the education staff, and does not take any initiative. Principals who have laissez-faire usually position themselves as spectators, even though he is in the midst of the education staff in school meetings because he considers leaders not to express too many opinions, so as not to reduce the rights and freedoms of members.
In the work environment generated by such educational leadership, various problems, such as work-related conflicts and arbitrariness, cannot be avoided.
The advantages of laissez-faire leaders:
- The decision is in the hands of subordinates so that subordinates can be independent and have initiative
- Leaders do not have great dominance
- Subordinates will not feel pressured in carrying out their duties
Weaknesses of laissez-faire leaders:
- The leader allows subordinates to act as they wish because there is no control
- Chaos and clashes easily occur
- Organizational goals will be difficult to achieve if subordinates do not have the right initiative and high dedication
Learn more
Types of leadership https://brainly.com/question/4127203, https://brainly.com/question/6657755
Details
Class: College
Subject: Social studies
Keyword: Types of leadership
