plz answer fast I will mark the best answer brainliest....
Mather calls himself an eyewitness to the event. Do you think eyewitness accounts are always believable? Why or why not? Write your answer in 50 to 75 words.
i think not because eyewitness means only the witness saw the event happen nobody else meaning the eyewitness could be lying, unless they're was multiple eye witnesses then it would be more believable compared to just one.
eyewitness means only the witness saw the event happen nobody else meaning the eyewitness could be lying, unless they're was multiple eye witnesses then it would be more believable compared to just one.
