A student conducted an experiment to test whether talking to plants would help them to grow faster. The student talked to one group of plants and hand watered them. The student did not talk to the other group of plants and used sprinklers. After three weeks, the plants that were spoken to showed much more growth than the plants that were not. Based on the results of this experiment, which is the best conclusion?

The best conclusion to this that I see is that in this situation the plants being spoken to and hand watered every day grew better.

My Conclusion: Plants that are given more attention, and loved to grow faster and better than plants that are not.

Answer Link

Larus Larus · Answer 2 · 2019-07-10T03:07:13+02:00

Answer:

The best conclusion on the basis of the result is that the student who had hand watered the plants and had talked to one group of the plants demonstrated much better growth, however, this is not because the student talked with them, it is generally because they were hand watered.

The hand watered plants showed better growths as they exhibited enough supply of water required for their growth and development. On the other hand, with the application of sprinklers, the adequate supply of water cannot get fulfilled.

There would be various areas remained where the water would not have reached with the use of sprinklers, and at certain locations, there would have been chances of waterlogging due to which death of plants may also take place.