1. Draw the causal network discussed in class for Newcomb’s Problem with perfect detection.
2. Use the causal network for Part (A) to explain whether the following argument is fallacious or not with perfect detection; where guaranteed the money in the clear box is denoted by $L, and the money that Eve might put into the black box is denoted $M. "Once a given amount of money is put into the black box, it is irreversibly fixed no matter how may boxes Adam might open in the future. Thus, if Eve had already put nothing in the black box, and if Adam later opens both boxes, then he will obtain $L compared to obtaining nothing if he instead opens only the black box. Likewise, if Eve had already put $M in the black box, and if Adam later opens both boxes, then he will obtain $M + $L compared to obtaining only $M if he instead opens only the black box. Therefore, it doesn’t matter whether Eve puts nothing or $M into the black box, either way Adam is guaranteed to obtain an extra $L by opening both boxes instead of opening only the black box.