Sophia spilled a cookies ' n cream latte on her computer two days before her term paper was due. She was in desperate need of a new laptop, so she went on Klist and found a laptop that fit her needs. She emailed the seller, Luci, expressing her desire to purchase the laptop. Luci emailed Sophia back and said that she would sell her laptop to Sophia for $250. Sophia and Luci signed the following agreement: I, Luci Lu, agree to sell my laptop computer to Sophia Bosh for Three Hundred Dollars and zero cents. This is the entirety of the agreement. This agreement supersedes any and all other agreements made by the seller and the buyer. Sophia now claims that she should only pay $250 for the laptop because during one of her email exchanges with Luci, Luci told her that $250 was the price of the laptop, and she has the email exchange as evidence of the price quote of $250. What legal concept could be used to enforce the contract for $300 ? a. Vesting. b. Statute of Frauds. c. Privity of Contract. d. The Parol Evidence Rule. e. Condition Precedent