Lindholm was an art collector represented by Malmberg, an art dealer. In 1987, Lindholm, with the assistance of
Malmberg, purchased Red Elvis (a silk-screen on canvas created by the famous artist Andy Warhol). In 2000,
Malmberg told Lindholm he could place Red Elvis on loan to the Louisiana Museum in Denmark if Lindholm agreed.
Lindholm agreed and transterred possession of the art to Malmberg. Malmberg did not place Red Elvis on loan to
the art museum; instead, he claimed ownership, and sold the work to Brant, an art collector. Later, Lindholm sold
Red Elvis to a Japanese buyer. Lindholm discovered Malmberg's fraud and sued to recover the work from Brant.
Brant argued he was a buyer in the ordinary course of business, and therefore entitled to keep Red Elvis. The
superior court of Connecticut issued a memorandum opinion agreeing with Brant.
Question: Is Brant a buyer in the ordinary course of business who has a claim of ownership to Red Elvis that is
superior to that of the owner Lindholm?